Pundit Press has moved on to bigger and better things.

Pundit Press now includes Pundit Press Radio and Pundit Press TV, bringing you the latest news and information with some of the top writers and broadcasters on the web today.

Please visit us at our new website: http://thepunditpress.com/.

Saturday, June 30, 2012

New Romney Ad: "Shame on You, Barack Obama"

Whoops, didn't even realize someone else had already posted this. Oh well, it's a solid ad:

Please bookmark!

Friday, June 29, 2012

Earthquake in China, June 29, 2012

A magnitude 6.2 earthquake has hit China. Stay tuned for more updates.

Please bookmark!

Uh-Oh: Wiretaps Reveal that DOJ Knew about Fast and Furious in Detail (After they Denied it Even Existed)

A smoking gun for the DOJ. Now what about Holder? From RollCall:
In the midst of a fiery floor debate over contempt proceedings for Attorney General Eric Holder, House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) quietly dropped a bombshell letter into the Congressional Record.

The May 24 letter to Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), ranking member on the panel, quotes from and describes in detail a secret wiretap application that has become a point of debate in the GOP’s “Fast and Furious” gun-walking probe.

The wiretap applications are under court seal, and releasing such information to the public would ordinarily be illegal. But Issa appears to be protected by the Speech or Debate Clause in the Constitution, which offers immunity for Congressional speech, especially on a chamber’s floor.

According to the letter, the wiretap applications contained a startling amount of detail about the operation, which would have tipped off anyone who read them closely about what tactics were being used.

Holder and Cummings have both maintained that the wiretap applications did not contain such details and that the applications were reviewed narrowly for probable cause, not for whether any investigatory tactics contained followed Justice Department policy.

The wiretap applications were signed by senior DOJ officials in the department’s criminal division, including Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jason Weinstein, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Blanco and another official who is now deceased.
Please bookmark!

New Romney Ad: Shame on You

Please bookmark!

Why the Congress Must Reign in the Supreme Court

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Please notice that this, the foundational sentence of the American way of life does not say “endowed by the Supreme Court.” 

Ever since the Supreme Court took unto itself the power to void laws passed by the representatives of the people in Marbury V. Madison the black-robed Justices have acted, and Americans have accepted them as if they are the source and the summit of what is and what isn’t allowed in America.  In most cases since the middle of the 20th century, the high court has sided with whatever the central government wanted to do in the way of extending its power and curtailing rights which any person who can read plainly sees protected in the document they are sworn to defend.

However, in Article Three of the Constitution, the one that outlines the judicial branch, after specifically enumerating which types of cases the Supreme Court shall try it says, “In all the other Cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.”

We often hear of obscure clauses of the Constitution which have been stretched and strained to sweep more power and authority into the never satisfied maw of the Federal Leviathan such as:

·         The “Necessary and Proper Clause” which is found in Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 states, “To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the [enumerated] Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.”  This is also known as the “Elastic Clause” because Congress and Presidents have stretched it to give them powers the Founders never would have dreamed possible outside a tyranny.

·         The “Commerce Clause” found in Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 states, “to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among several States, and with the Indian Tribes.”  This is the go-to clause for the Progressive’s conquest of America.  This is the clause that was used in the 1930s by FDR to implement most of the New Deal.  It was used by LBJ in the 1960s to impose the Great Society.  And it is being used by BHO in the 21st century to shackle us with the social democracy brand of socialism which has devastated Europe and which has been repudiated by our former adversaries in the Cold War. 

      In the Supreme Court decision Wickard v. Filburn in 1942 it was handed down from on   high that wheat farmer growing wheat on his own property for his own use can be         legally regulated under the commerce clause because not selling your wheat and using it           yourself is actually competing with wheat that is sold and is therefore commerce.  This is the same clause the Obama Administration originally used as a defense to say they can fine people for not buying insurance arguing that not buying insurance is commerce.

Yes, these two clauses have been stretched and interpreted beyond any semblance of rationality to restrict and restrain Americans in the enjoyment of the freedom and liberty which should be our birthright, yet the clause which clearly states that Congress has the power to reign in the Court has been ignored.

Forget all the posturing about abortion by all the so-called conservatives in Congress. Has there ever been a concerted, protracted or sustained effort to remove abortion from the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court?  No there hasn’t.  And yet tomorrow, or even today Congress could pass a law stating that abortion is an exception to the court’s jurisdiction and with the signing of this law by the president Roe V. Wade would be null and void, and all state laws affecting abortion would once again be in effect.  And this same procedure could be used for the representatives of the people to take back control of the law and the country from the Court.

The Congress is elected. The Supreme Court is appointed.  Congress can be replaced. The Justices of the Supreme Court serve for life.  They could be impeached and removed; however, none have ever been removed and the likelihood of that happening is remote.  There are checks and balances in the process of passing laws.  The Senate is a check on the House and the House on the Senate.  The President is a check on Congress and Congress is a check on the President.  There is a check designed to restrain the Supreme Court from becoming a black-robed committee of kings: Article 3, Section 2, Clause 2 giving Congress the power to create exceptions to the Court’s jurisdiction.  However, tradition and the desire of professional politicians to demagogue about issues instead of solve them keeps the perpetually re-elected from reigning in these want-a-be demigods.

Thursday June 28, 2012 will live in the memory of all patriotic Americans as a day of infamy along with Pearl Harbor, and 9-11. This is the day the Supreme Court ruled that if the Central government can’t force American citizens to do what they want them to do one way they can do it another.

When the Obama Administration and their co-conspirators, the Progressive Democratic Party in Congress, rammed Obamacare through Congress they argued that the fines imposed under the individual mandate upon anyone who didn’t purchase health insurance wasn’t a tax, but that it was penalty allowable under the Commerce Clause.  According to the Constitution all tax bills must begin in the House.  Obamacare began in the Senate; however, that was all right since the fines weren’t taxes they were penalties.

When the issue got to court and it became clear there wasn’t a majority ready to declare not buying insurance was commerce the Obama Administration argued there was no standing to litigate the individual mandate and the fine it imposed because it is a tax.  Through the looking glass inside the beltway and behind the curtain it’s a penalty when that argument works and it’s a tax when that argument works.

Sophistry is defined as “Reasoning that appears sound but is misleading or fallacious. In Metaphysics, Aristotle defines sophistry as ‘wisdom in appearance only.’”  When we look at that definition from now on it will be hard not to see the face of Chief Justice Roberts who today showed his true colors as the midwife of totalitarianism.  While declaring unconstitutional the very arguments used to pass the law the majority declared the law constitutional based upon the very arguments its opponents used to try and defeat the bill.  Up is down, right is wrong, and the government can do whatever it wants.

During the ratification debate when addressing the Supreme Court one of the leading Anti-Federalists wrote, “There is no power above them to control any of their decisions.  There is no authority that can remove them, and they cannot be controlled by the laws of the legislature.  In short, they are independent of the people, of the legislature, and of every power under heaven.  Men placed in this situation will generally soon feel independent of heaven itself.”

The balance between the central government and the once free citizens it is attempting to turn into dumbed down helpless dependents has been significantly changed.  As predicted by the Anti-Federalists, the courts have been used over and over to expand the power of the central government to the detriment of the States and the citizens.  Today we crossed a threshold; we passed a tipping point and are no longer at the edge of the abyss. We are careening down the cliff into the fearful embrace of totalitarianism.  An over the top Supreme Court has given the green light to an out of control Progressive Administration, and as of today there are no checks and there is no balance.

Those of us who love liberty and are dedicated to limited government must contact our representatives and demand that the Supreme Court be brought under control.  Something must be done to preserve liberty or the United States we have loved will become the one we have dreaded.  An all-powerful central government will continue to grow and bend all things to its will.  We must return to the literal definition of constitutional government or this living document will be the death of freedom and the graveyard of liberty.

Keep the faith.  Keep the peace.  We shall overcome.

Dr. Owens teaches History, Political Science, and Religion for Southside Virginia Community College.  He is the Historian of the Future @ http://drrobertowens.com © 2012 Robert R. Owens drrobertowens@hotmail.com  Follow Dr. Robert Owens on Facebook or Twitter @ Drrobertowens

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Complete List of Democrats Voting to Hold Holder in Contempt of Congress

The House of Representatives just voted to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in criminal contempt of Congress for stonewalling the House Oversight Committee's efforts to get to the bottom of what occurred in the horrifically planned and ultimately deadly "fast and furious" program.

While the House Democratic leadership and their allies have attempted to paint this as nothing more then pure petty politics, the roll call from today's vote reveals something interesting... 17 Democrats voted to hold Holder in contempt - destroying the media's partisan narrative, and possibly giving more Democrats wiggle room to also oppose the embattled Attorney General.

Here are the 17 Democrats who voted to hold Holder in contempt:

Jason Altmire:
John Barrow:
Dan Boren:
Leonard Boswell:
Ben Chandler:
Mark Critz:
Joe Donnelly:
Kathy Hochul:
Ron Kind:
Larry Kissell:
Jim Matheson:
Mike McIntyre:
Bill Owens:
Collin Peterson:
Nick Rahall:
Mike Ross:
Tim Walz:
Added plus: Bill Owens and Kathy Hochul are from New York, one of the bluest states (if not the bluest) in the nation.

Please Bookmark!

House Finds Holder in Criminal Contempt

With 17 Democrats to boot. From Fox News:
The GOP-led House voted Thursday to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress for failing to provide key information pertaining to Operation Fast and Furious, making Holder the first sitting Cabinet member to be held in contempt.

The vote was 255-67 with one lawmaker voting not present. Seventeen Democrats broke ranks to vote in favor of contempt, while two Republicans voted against the measure.

The vote was preceded by a heated floor debate.

“It’s important to remember how we got here,” House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said during a speech ahead of the vote. “The Justice Department has not provided the facts and information we requested. … It’s our constitutional duty to find out.”

The GOP-led House took the step over the alleged failure to provide additional information about the failed gun-running operation known as Fast and Furious which was run by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives -- a division of the Justice Department led by Holder.
Please bookmark!

Dems: Republicans are "Lynching" Eric Holder

With hundreds dead, including an American, thousands of guns missing, and corruption infecting the Obama Administration, the Left has reacted exactly as you would expect them to. Crazed liberals have declared the upcoming vote to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt is a "lynching."

Here are just a few examples of the incendiary rhetoric.

"To recap:"
"Car thief?" Whatever:
"GOP lynch mobs:"
Again, "lynch mob:"

God help me, these are some of the dumbest things I have ever read.

Please bookmark!

Video: CNN Reporting that ObamaCare was Overturned

Please bookmark!

Organizing a DC Protest to Repeal-- We Need Your Help

The Supreme Court has spoken...

But the American people have, too. With a large majority of this country against ObamaCare, we are left with one recourse: we must sweep the Congressional and Presidential elections.

And not just win, but give a President Romney the 60 votes in the Senate and a large majority in the House.

Look, I didn't vote for Romney in the primaries-- and I think that RomneyCare is unconstitutional, too. It's too late for that argument. Either you are going to vote to strike down ObamaCare or you won't. It's that simple.

That is why I'm proposing a sweeping protest that will be too large for the media to ignore and pop culture to malign.

September 1, 2012 on the National Mall. One million people. We can do this! It's a Saturday near Labor Day that is approachable for millions of conservatives that believe that the only "individual mandate" is one that the individual gives themselves.

Let's get this ball rolling-- let's organize it with all of our blogs. Will you join us?

Please bookmark!

Video of Obama Saying the Individual Mandate is Not a Tax

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

Please bookmark!
moe, larry, curly, shemp, abbot,
costello, w.c. fields, dangerfield
and lewis black - - - - - - - - - - -


your fellow stooges, comedians
and idiots in congress, the senate
and the white house --

My fellow Americans, we now have a state of
confusion/idiocy, and tyrants rule.  Holder will
probably now win the nobel peace prize, the
November elections will probably be called off,
and we will have to bow to the dictator from
another country who intends to ruin our way of

The supreme (and I use the term loosely) court
has just revealed themselves to be as stupid, as
cowardly, and as asinine as Barry, the white house
zzars, the idiots in congress and the senate.

Not a one of them is fit to live off the benefits of
a free country.  Not one of them is fit to accept a
paycheck for the pitiful job they are doing.

They all deserve a gulag somewhere, but it will
be those who provide the paycheck who will
undoubtedly see the inside of a cell without

May God have mercy on those who are left.

Watch Obama Speech on Health Care, June 28, 2012

Free desktop streaming application by Ustream

Please bookmark!

Roberts Betrays Constitution, Is Key Swing Vote on ObamaCare

In a shocking display of constitutional ignorance, Chief Justice John Roberts was the deciding swing vote that declared ObamaCare unconstitutional. Roberts joined the liberal wing of the court.

Justice Kennedy, who was expected to be the swing vote, came out strongly against ObamaCare. To conservatives, Roberts has stabbed them in the back.

Please bookmark!

ObamaCare Declared Constitutional

Fox News is reporting that ObamaCare has been upheld in its entirety, after reporting that it was struck down. Very fluid.

Update- Fox says that the SCOTUS has declared the law constitutional by a 5-4 vote. Even worse, they are reporting that Chief Justice ROBERTS was the swing vote and not Justice Kennedy.

Please bookmark!

What Happened With the Health Care Law?


The Supreme Court of the United States today struck a decisive blow against the Obama Administration today, declaring that the main portion of his overhaul of US Health Care, the individual mandate, is unconstitutional.

In a 5-4 decision, the Justices struck down the mandate, the funding mechanism for ObamaCare. Without it, much of the remainder of the bill is likely to fall.

The Supreme Court
However, the SCOTUS did state that the rest of ObamaCare is constitutional. Regardless, this is a huge blow for the President, whose only major "accomplishment" during his four years in office has been declared mostly null and void.

Please bookmark!

BREAKING: Individual Mandate STRUCK DOWN | Conflicting Reports: Constitutional

UPDATE- Conflicting information is coming out of Fox News. They stated it was declared unconstitutional, but now are backtracking.  They have also backtracked on the vote tally.

Update #2- Fox News is reporting that ObamaCare has been upheld in its entirety, after reporting that it was struck down.  Very fluid.

Update #3- Fox says that the SCOTUS has declared the law constitutional by a 5-4 vote.  Even worse, they are reporting that Chief Justice ROBERTS was the swing vote and not Justice Kennedy.

The Supreme Court of the United States today struck a decisive blow against the Obama Administration today, declaring that the main portion of his overhaul of US Health Care, the individual mandate, is unconstitutional.

In a 5-4 decision, the Justices struck down the mandate, the funding mechanism for ObamaCare. Without it, much of the remainder of the bill is likely to fall.
The Supreme Court
However, the SCOTUS did state that the rest of ObamaCare is constitutional. Regardless, this is a huge blow for the President, whose only major "accomplishment" during his four years in office has been declared mostly null and void.

CNN says mandate is struck down:
...And now they say upheld:

Please bookmark!

Live Video of Health Care Ruling Live

Free desktop streaming application by Ustream

Please bookmark!

Live Video of ObamaCare Ruling

Free desktop streaming application by Ustream

Please bookmark!

Health Care Law Court Ruling Live Coverage 6/28/2012

A live thread here following the results of the ObamaCare ruling.

9:58: Still no sign.

9:59: Justices emerge.


Live Video of ObamaCare Ruling

Please bookmark!

ObamaCare Ruling Results Live 6/28/2012

A live thread here following the results of the ObamaCare ruling.

9:58: Still no sign.

9:59: Justices emerge.


Live Video of ObamaCare Ruling

Please bookmark!
Dumb, Dumber, Dumbest :

So, a reporter axed the galactically stupid Nancy Pelosi the following

"Madam Speaker, where specifically does the Constitution grant Congress
the authority to enact an individual health insurance mandate?"

And I am beginning to believe that Pelosi was born in Kenya, Singapore,
Nairobi or Indonesia also, and has no papers.  Her response to the
question was:

"Are  you  serious?  Are  you  serious?"

Anyone that stupid has no business being in a position of power in the
government of the United States of America.

She makes the Dumb and Dumber movie look like Einstein talking to

Just sayin'.

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Vote: What Will Happen with ObamaCare?

The verdict that the Supreme Court of the United States will release about ObamaCare is arguably their most important decision in decades. Can the government force people to buy a service that they do not necessarily want? Can the government force people to buy other things just because they deem it necessary?

More than just questions about health care, the SCOTUS decision on ObamaCare has large implications on the 2012 elections. Democrats, including President Obama, have already started to attack the court, attempting to limit the damage that an unfavorable ruling will have. But will a confirmation of Mr. Obama's legislation give his campaign a boost?

All of these questions will be answered, at least in part, at 10 am. At the moment, however, you can voice your opinion on what the SCOTUS will decide. Will the entire law go down? Will it be upheld? Will the individual mandate alone fall? Vote below:

Please bookmark!
When  A  Liar  Lies,  Does Anyone
                                Believe it?

"I'm not a perfect and I'll never be a perfect president but I told
you that I'll always tell you what I thought, I'll always tell you
what I believe, and most importantly I told you I'll wake up every
single day and fight as hard as I knew how for you. 

 Barry Soetoro -- Westin Peachtree Plaza Hotel, Atlanta, GA,
June 27, 2012

The only truth in the above is:  Westin Peachtree Plaza Hotel,
Atlanta, GA.

Using the decoder ring which came out of the same crackerjack
box as Barry's Nobel Peace Prize, we ran the above statement
through the magic ring, and this is what come out as the real

"I am perfect, I will always be known as the most perfect
president in the history of America;  whatever I told you before
does not matter, this is now, and I am perfect, therefore, always
right.  I will lie to you till the camels come back to the tent, I will
tell you I believe those lies - let me be perfectly clear -- everything
I say is a lie, but if I believe it, that makes it true.  I will wake up every
single day and lie my butt off, because I can, I am the most perfect
president in history."

-- Barry/Barack/Harrison J. Bounel/Soetoro/Davis/Obama

Syria's Advanced Anti-Air Defenses Cause New Problem for West

With the Syrian assault on a Turkish warplane last weekend pushing the international community to meet once again, and to decide on a reasonable plan for removing Assad (hint: peaceful transition isn't going to work, Mr. Annan), it is being reported overseas that the anti-aircraft weapon used to down the warplane was built in Iran.

In the aftermath of Israel's 2007 attack on Syria's suspected nuclear reactor (thanks Israel, by the way...), the Syrian government has bulked up the nation's anti-air defenses, and this weapon, which is designed to target aircraft attempting to fly under the radar - caught the Turkish pilots off-guard as they were unaware Syria had acquired such technology.

It also brings an inconvenient truth to the forefront: Syria's anti-air defenses are among the more superior systems in the world, even more so then Iran's, due to the small size of the country and the density of the weapons they have positioned, thus guaranteeing a difficult conflict if and when western forces do attack.

The curious internal crisis of Syria is rapidly devolving each and every day into a bloodier mess, as scores upon scores are killed regularly in the fighting, and Assad's stranglehold over Damascus refuses to release its horrifying grip. Only the combined forces of Arab and Western militaries can oust this mad man...

List of Democrats Voting Holder in Contempt

Update: The House has voted to hold Attorney General Holder in contempt. Seventeen (17) Democrats voted with Republicans. We will have an updated list as soon as possible. The names below are people who publicly came out against Holder before the vote today:

Already, there are a few democrat members of the House that have declared that they will be voting to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt. This on its face destroys the far-Left's assertions that the vote is strictly partisan. It is literally the opposite now: bi-partisan.

And the list is growing.

Representative Jim Matheson of Utah has declared that he would vote Holder in contempt. Mr. Matheson also unequivocally voiced his distaste for the corruption the Obama Administration is fostering, saying, "Sadly, it seems that it will take holding the attorney general in contempt to communicate that evasiveness is unacceptable. It is a vote I will support."
Mr. Matheson
Representative John Barrow of Georgia has also stated his support for finding Holder in contempt. Mr. Barrow said, in part, "the Attorney General has decided to withhold relevant documents. The only way to get to the bottom of what happened is for the Department of Justice to turn over the remaining documents, so that we can work together to ensure this tragedy never happens again."
Mr. Barrow
Representatives Nick Rahall of West Virginia and Collin Peterson of Minnesota have joined as well. Defending his planned vote, Peterson described the Obama Administration's rational for executive privileges as "gobbledygook." He went on to say, "I don’t know what the hell they are talking about."
Mr. Peterson
Echoing Peterson's sentiment, Rahall stated, "I don’t think executive privilege was warranted."
Mr. Rahall
The list is ever-growing. Already four brave democrats have come out against the corruption of the Obama Administration. With the vote tomorrow, there are estimates that as many as 20 democrats will vote to declare Holder in contempt.

Partisan Republican powergrab my ass.

Please bookmark!

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Pundit Press projection: Wendy Long Clinches Nomination

With nearly 40% of precincts reporting in today's dynamic three-way battle for the U.S. Senate Republican nomination in New York, Pundit Press is able to project Wendy Long will claim the evening with roughly 55 to 60 percent of the vote and will face off against incumbent Kirsten Gillibrand this November.

Hatch vs. Liljenquist Utah Senate Results

Utah Senate results - 10:17 PM - 2% of precincts reporting

Hatch - 23,584 - 70%
Liljenquist - 10,144 - 30%

New York Republican Senate Results

Results - updated 9:58 PM - 36% of precincts reporting

Long - 37,073
Turner - 20,104
Maragos - 5,774

Update 2: Polls are now closed... Results should start coming in within the hour.

Update: Just a quick question for voters... What number were you are your local precinct? I was #24 in a town of over 3,000 residents

The interesting three-way race between U.S. Congressman Bob Turner, former Clarence Thomas law clerk Wendy Long and Nassau County Comptroller George Maragos will finally be decided tonight as polls close for the 2012 U.S. Senate Republican primary in just 25 minutes all across New York State.

The last opinion poll on the election had 70% of Republicans undecided, so any one of the three candidates could emerge victorious as the votes are tallied.

Governor Jay Nixon (D-MO): Parts Of Obamacare Just Don't Make Any Sense

Please bookmark!

Monday, June 25, 2012

Syria Fires at Second Turkish Plane

The last time this happened, only a few days ago, Turkey said they would not let it stand. What will happen now? From Fox News:
Turkey's deputy prime minister says Syrian forces have opened fire on a second Turkish plane that was searching for the wreckage of a jet earlier shot down by Syria.

Bulent Arinc told a televised news conference Monday that Syrian forces opened fire on a CASA search and rescue plane following the downing of a RF-4E reconnaissance jet in international airspace on Friday. Arinc did not say whether the search and rescue plane was hit.

He says the Syrian side ceased fire after a warning from the Turkish military.
Please bookmark!

MSM Scrambles to Deceive Readers about Arizona Court Ruling

Just five days ago, MSNBC ran an article describing SB 1070 as the "papers, please" immigration law. MSNBC framed the law as if the only the provision in it allowed police officers to inquire about the immigration status of criminals.

Today, the Supreme Court has ruled that that key provision is constitutional. Yet, in its wake the Main Stream Media has instantly changed their tune, declaring that the high court has struck down the law. The importance of the provision that they once declared indefensible and unconstitutional? All but forgotten in their headlines.

MSNBC, for example, has this headline blaring on their front page:
The intent, of course, is obvious: anyone simply reading the headline will think that the most important parts of SB 1070 were declared unconstitutional. The "key parts" that MSNBC so desperately wants you to believe in were never at the heart of the lawsuit.

CNN, never to fall behind their liberal brethren, pulled the same stunt. This is on the front of their website:

Again, the most controversial part of the law was upheld. The part of the law that liberals had formerly bemoaned was declared constitutional. But now, as it is in place, to the MSM trying to spin a story, it is an afterthought.

Please bookmark!
The Real  S. A. T. --

The Soetoro Achievement Test

Pick the answers you feel are most true;  if in doubt,
pick those which infer that Barry/Barackack  is a liar,
has too many aliases, too many Social Security numbers,
and was born in a stone-age country with no working

Expect some redundancy, stupidancy, and Soetoroancy.
Ten easy questions, and, as with this president, there are
more questions than answers.

1.   The Supreme Court will do which of the following?

      a.  find Barryack guilty of being the biggest liar on the planet
      b.  rule Barry not elgible to be president
      c.  rule obamacare unconstitutional
      d.  rule michelle unconstitutional

2.   Eric Himpton Holder will this week --

      a.  be cited for contempt of the truth
      b.  be cited for contempt of the American People
      c.  be cited for being a lazy, no good bum
      d.  be cited for contempt of Congress
      e.  be thrown under Barry's bus
      f.   will quit
      g.  will start a new job at Don Rickles house

3.   Michelle Soetoro/Obama will this week --

      a.  make a tacky fool of herself in London
      b.  spend millions on this trip
      c.  not miss her tacky husband one time
      d.  hope the White House is filled with wedding gifts
           when she returns

4.  Egypt will receive from Barry this month --

     a.  an official visit
     b.  a bunch of taxpayer money
     c.  George W's new portrait
     d.  a plea for all Egyptian wedding presents

5.  Obama's campaign funds will --

     a.  will wind up in an offshore account in the name of
          Harrison J. Bounel
     b.  be stashed in Moocher-lle's underwear drawer
     c.  be stolen and end up in Indonesia
     d.  be unable to be accounted for

6.  Sheriff Joe this week will --

     a.  release records proving that Barry is not a citizen
     b.  release records proving that Barry is a fraud
     c.  release records proving that Barry is a felon
     d.  come up missing

7.  Barry/Barock will in the next 90 days --

     a.  become an Eagle Scout
     b. receive another ignoble/Nobel Peace Prize
     c.  the CrackerJack company will go bankrupt
     d.  will cease and desist his stupid grinning
     e.  will resign the presidency
     f.   will become a tin-pot dictator of Micronesia

8.  Barry/Hussein/Harrison J/Davis's legacy will be:

     a.  the crease in his trousers
     b.  his pathological lying
     c.  his pathetic arrogance
     d.  his dumb dog
     e.  his affair with Chris Matthews
     f.  his crying when he has to resign
     g. he will have no legacy

9.  The elections this November will:

     a.  not happen
     b.  be stolen
     c.  be gooned
     d.  Romney will win huge

10.The pathetic Soetoro/Bounel/Obama family will --

     a.  fade into a foreign sunset
     b.  Michelle will become morbidly obese
     c.  Barry will end up in Chicago on skid row
     d.  Sash and Mal will be the next girl band
     e.  the mother-out-law will end up in a hut overseas
          with the rest of the relatives

Sunday, June 24, 2012

Flashback- W.H.: Muslim Brotherhood "Secular," Won't Seek Presidency

It was announced today that the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt has won the country's Presidential election. This comes after former leader Hosni Mubarak was forced from power as his long time ally, the United States, backed his exit.

The White House does not want you to remember some facts today. Unfortunately for them, the internet never forgets.

In February of last year, the White House was very busy giving the Muslim Brotherhood free PR. This prompted the Telegraph to write an article entitled, "The Muslim Brotherhood gets a PR makeover from the Obama administration."

In the piece, Administration officials are quoted as saying that the Muslim Brotherhood is a "largely secular" organisation that "eschewed violence." Today, after winning the Presidency, the M.B. declared that, "Allah willing," their new capital would be in Jerusalem. Something tells me that they are planning something that does not "eschew violence."

And the most ironic piece of news is that, back when the White House was giving the Brotherhood free publicity, the M.B. decided to declare that they would not seek the Egyptian Presidency. The White House welcomed the news. And this is the most ironic screenshot of the day (click on the image for better quality):

So after a year of guessing, the White House is shown to be completely wrong and incompetent. Better, the Left enjoyed whining that Republicans were making a big deal out of the Muslim Brotherhood and that it was a political witchhunt.

But I'm certain that they would never use such wrong, broken, deceitful rhetoric again, right? Right? Oh, yeah.

Please bookmark!
Why Do You Go To Church -- Really?

Then the publicans and sinners drew near unto him, for the
purpose of hearing him.  And the Pharisees and scribes
complained saying, this man welcomes sinners and eats
with them.   And  he  spoke  this  parable  unto  them,
saying.                                             Luke 15:1-3

Interesting story here, what?  Jesus is going to teach.  Who shows
up?  Two groups, made up of similiar people.  The first group is
the publicans and sinners.  They are lumped together because their
backgrounds and lifestyles are similiar, one as bad as the other.

First, lets discuss the publicans.  The publicans were the tax
collectors, you know, the guys who go around extorting working
people on behalf of the government;  some real bad people.  Their
reputation was so bad, and they were so hated, the Jews would not
allow them in the synagog.  They were not allowed to testify in
open court, and if they donated any money to the synagog, it was
refused.  Thats' how much they were hated.  Can you say IRS?

Then the sinners.  Sort of self explanatory, this was a group who
made no pretense to any sort of religion, who looked at church
people clearly, and quite frankly, could not see much difference
between church goers, and themselves.  And of course, they were
counted as no different than the tax collectors, for good reason.

Interesting thing is, both of these sorts of people, in this one group,
crowded around Jesus to hear what he had to say.  Even though they
were ruthless extortioners and common sinners, they knew an
honest teacher when they heard him.  And, they knew they needed
his truth.

They came to the service --  to  hear.

Then we have the next group, the scribes and Pharisees.  First, the
scribes.  This group, at about the age of 12 or 13, were hand-picked
to study the scriptures, and the law.  Back then, to them, both were
about the same, the law was based on scripture.  They were tested,
and if they passed, they were allowed to study until they were 30.
Only then were they qualified to be placed in positions of authority,
and many of those positions included teaching what they knew.

Having studied the scripture and the law, they knew facts,
scripture and evidence.  Of all people, they knew the Old
Testament, and the prophecies, and the things to come.  Should have
known, welcomed and accepted the person and ministry of Jesus.

Then we have our favorites -- those Pharisees.  You know, the church
leaders, the "spiritual" ones who knew "everything," ran everything in
the synagog, and hated Jesus.  They too, should have known everything
in scripture concerning the Messiah and his ministry.  And their only
reason for showing up was so they could act religious.

They  came  to  the  service -- to complain.

So, to skip right to the point, why are you going to church today?

To hear and learn? 

Or, to murmur and complain?

Next week, the parable.

Check this out!