tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3002295256310995661.post370080814149771185..comments2024-02-26T03:31:17.162-05:00Comments on Pundit Press: Obama Promises "Peace in Our Time" In Inauguration SpeechUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3002295256310995661.post-32528292676663495252013-01-31T17:34:38.077-05:002013-01-31T17:34:38.077-05:00Exactly! The most naive President to date, and wit...Exactly! The most naive President to date, and with a disastrous foreign policy. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3002295256310995661.post-32632691753910923362013-01-22T18:57:43.781-05:002013-01-22T18:57:43.781-05:00clodclodAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3002295256310995661.post-782119443847566702013-01-22T14:38:19.344-05:002013-01-22T14:38:19.344-05:00The point, Mr. 10:46 a.m. Anonymous, is that Obama...The point, Mr. 10:46 a.m. Anonymous, is that Obama spoke approvingly of "peace in our time" and did so while talking about the U.S. role in the world. I'm not sure it represents his ignorance of history, though; it sounds more like a signal that he contemplates a very limited global role for the United States. Especially when read together with his strawman crack about avoiding "perpetual war."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3002295256310995661.post-68729687863112193552013-01-22T10:33:51.284-05:002013-01-22T10:33:51.284-05:00... mere charity ...???... mere charity ...???Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3002295256310995661.post-65255029705734033232013-01-22T00:23:27.032-05:002013-01-22T00:23:27.032-05:00But the result may be the same........But the result may be the same........Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3002295256310995661.post-36565733932590438432013-01-21T22:46:56.101-05:002013-01-21T22:46:56.101-05:00The President didn't promise "peace in ou...The President didn't promise "peace in our time." He was simply saying that peace in our time would require a constant advance of certain principles. No offense but this nitpicky, out-of-context semantics is a ridiculous way to criticize Obama - he's done enough as President to warrant serious and legitimate criticism; you should be discussing those in a rational manner. The irony, of course, is that even the cause you advance is just as destructive of those same principles Obama endorses. Moreover, the principles he alludes to, and those you'd probably advance yourself, are imperfect and require some serious recalibration - but this is probably lost amongst partisan hackery, such as that which you posted today.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com