tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3002295256310995661.post2108250714613835206..comments2024-02-26T03:31:17.162-05:00Comments on Pundit Press: Schultz Allows Pro-Socialist, Sexist, Possibly Homophobic Comments on Facebook PageUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3002295256310995661.post-8637135266670874382010-10-04T03:12:53.896-04:002010-10-04T03:12:53.896-04:00I think you'd probably find that most liberals...I think you'd probably find that most liberals ARE reasonable, just as I'm pretty sure that most conservatives are. It's the fringe wackos on both sides that you have to worry about. Those who refuse to tolerate anyone who doesn't share their narrow point of view.<br /><br />I think liberals and conservatives have a lot more in common than the media gives us credit for and the negativity I see in the media is disheartening to me.<br /><br />Imagine what we could accomplish if we all ignored the pundits, dropped the Us vs. Them mentality and worked together to find compromises that we can all live with. <br /><br />Everything is about give and take. And the more we give, the less we have to take.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3002295256310995661.post-41215585110203725412010-10-03T23:40:22.607-04:002010-10-03T23:40:22.607-04:00Point taken. I'm glad to see that you are a r...Point taken. I'm glad to see that you are a reasonable liberal...I added the qualifier "possibly" because many do indeed see it as a homophobic act. Even though our site is conservative, feel free to come back.Aureliushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16201826632699676283noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3002295256310995661.post-52515038675878665632010-10-03T23:32:08.303-04:002010-10-03T23:32:08.303-04:00Sorry. My mistake. But please do look at the Wik...Sorry. My mistake. But please do look at the Wikipedia link yourself. And I hope you'll correct your accusation against Mr. Schultz, since your assumption that the term teabagger is homophobic is clearly wrong.<br /><br />I'm not particularly a fan of Mr. Schultz. I find him a bit bombastic. But if you want to make a point, it helps to make that point with factual statements. I have no doubt that you may have believed that teabagging is a homosexual act, but now that you know you're wrong, it only makes sense to correct the record.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3002295256310995661.post-66854744899918677292010-10-03T23:21:45.394-04:002010-10-03T23:21:45.394-04:00Anonymous, while you are welcome to post your opin...Anonymous, while you are welcome to post your opinion, please do not link to sites with "nsfw" images. I will repost your comment below with the link taken out:<br /><br />Sorry to burst your bubble, but teabagging is a common practice in the heterosexual world and is in no way exclusive to the homosexual community. You don't think women do it? Then you're sorely misinformed. Educate yourself.Aureliushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16201826632699676283noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3002295256310995661.post-18202567353341267182010-10-03T21:59:24.517-04:002010-10-03T21:59:24.517-04:00I'm glad someone is finally calling the word &...I'm glad someone is finally calling the word "teabagger" homophobic. The act itself (which I won't go into for obvious reasons) is done by gay men. If that is what they want to do, that is okay. However, to hijack it and make it into an insult (which progressives have been doing) makes it homophobic. Like the word "gay," it wasn't originally homophobic, but now that it has been hijacked (by people who call things "gay" when they don't like it), in some cases it is indeed homophobic.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com